Saturday 2 January 2021

Which Planets or Moons are most Likely to harbour Life?


(Picture Credit - VectorStock) 

Here is an olde article of mine from 2001. Still relevant I hope. Enjoy.

Summary: We keep hearing of a new planet or moon that might hold life. Or of projects to monitor radio signals, or even send them a message. Finding life somewhere beyond Earth’s atmosphere would be wonderful. About five hundred planets have now been discovered. Many moons too. Is there life out there? Here is a summary of what has been found.

As recently as last October we heard of yet another new planet that might have life (“Gliese 581 g”). About 500 planets have been discovered now, most of these within the last twenty years. The quest goes on to find life “out there” on some planet or moon. Radio waves have been monitored, even messages sent.

What we seek, ideally, is another Earth. A rock-like world just under 10,000 miles in diameter, with a breathable atmosphere and water. Earth is actually about 7,900 miles in diameter, with an atmosphere roughly 78% nitrogen and 21% Oxygen. (All my figures will be rounded off here for convenience). The planet is located in the Sun’s “Goldilocks Zone”: the best distance away for a surface temperature that is “just right”. For Earth that’s a mean temperature of 14C ( and a minimum of minus 89C, maximum of 58C). Well, that’s the ideal we are looking for. Starting from Earth, and moving roughly outwards into space, let us see what planets and moons may hold life.

 Our nearest neighbours: The Moon, Venus, Mars and Mercury

First, The Moon. With a diameter of  2,160 miles it has only a trace atmosphere (near-vacuum). The mean surface temperature is 123C by day, Minus 233 by night. So, almost no chance of life. “Signatures” of ice have been found in some “shielded” craters but... Best chance of life is in underground caverns.

Nearest planet Venus: about the same size as Earth. Located at the inner edge of our Goldilocks zone. Mid twentieth century scientists and artists depicted lush jungles or a planet-wide ocean. However, in the 1960s Russian and other probes found it was a true “Hell”. The surface temperature is over 460C (about the boiling point of lead). Much of the ground is covered by volcanic lava. The atmospheric pressure is 92 times that on Earth (densest atmosphere in the solar system). Only chance of life is either high in the carbon-dioxide and sulphuric acid clouds (!) or very deep underground.

To mention Mercury: nearest planet to the Sun. This planet is rather similar to the Moon but much hotter. Enough said. (Venus is even hotter on the surface than Mercury).

Mars, 4th planet from the Sun, is a much better prospect. At least you can stand on the surface there in a decent spacesuit without being fried, frozen or blown away. Its surface temperatures range from about 0C to minus 130C. There are traces of water about, notably at its polar ice caps. Solar radiation is a negative factor, even at that distance from the sun (about 125 million miles). With a diameter of 4225 miles, Mars only retains a thin atmosphere. Outside chance of bacterial life here, maybe underground.

 The moons of Jupiter and Saturn

Io, the 3rd largest moon of gas giant Jupiter (5th planet) is our next port of call. Its diameter is a healthy 2264 miles. Io is noted for its volcanicity, especially plumes going 186 miles up. Its surface temperature is minus 73C to minus 143C. Thin sulphur dioxide atmosphere.  There might be some life hugging those volcanoes. Io is often mentioned as maybe having life, anyway.

Next, Europa. This one is quite famous now. Smallest of the 4 “Gallilean Moons” , but possibly covered at least in part by a 62 mile thick water ocean, topped by ice sheets. Forget the surface: hydrothermal vents could be proving sufficient heat for life to flourish. This is one of the most exciting finds so far. Remember, Europa.

To gas giant Saturn now (6th planet) with its iconic rings. Next stop Enceladus, one of its smaller moons (diameter 310 miles). Bottom line here is that the “Cassini” probe flew through a plume of water vapour which came from Enceladus. Hence it is thought there may be lots of liquid water beneath the surface, all heated by tidal forces. There is plenty of carbon too...

Final stop within the solar system is Titan, Saturn’s largest moon. Titan resembles a young Primordial Earth, having a thick cloudy atmosphere of Nitrogen, Methane etc. It has lakes or seas of methane, but water is rock solid. If life can live in methane, instead of water, then bingo! If!

 To the stars

That’s 6 out of about 500 planets covered. All but 2 of the rest are out there, orbiting other Stars. Most stars are red dwarves (spectral type M), but some are slightly bigger than the sun and white or yellow (F type), others are like the Sun (G type), and more are orange (K type) and smaller. F, G and K types look best (size and heat-wise) for having habitable planets. Some M types feature too however.

“Locally” our best candidate stars are: Alpha Centauri system (3 stars – G, K and M types) 4 Light Years away; Epsilon Eridani (K) 10 LY (2 proposed large planets); 61 Cygni A and B (both K) 11LY; Epsilon Indi A (K) 12LY, Tau Ceti (G) 12LY; Gliese 676 (M) 15LY (which has 4 big planets) and finally Gliese 581 (M) 20LY (6 planets known).

Epsilon Eridani and Tau Ceti have long been targeted as likely locations for “New Earth”. However, Tau Ceti has been “relegated” down the list as it lacks the metals required for Earthlike planets. Last September planet Gliese 581g was found: an earth sized world in its star’s Goldilocks zone. Only drawback is that the planet is tidally locked so only one side faces the sun (so no days or nights as such). Still, the best find so far amongst the stars.

So, I hope, like me you are ready for the next big discovery. At least one more rocky “terrestrial” planet or moon, revolving around a suitable star or (in the case of a moon) gas giant like Jupiter. When you hear of such a discovery, just remember you were “warned” about if first right here.

PS 2\1\2021 – Since I wrote the above, literally thousands of exoplanets have been discovered. Also they now believe that the Jupiter moon Ganymede (the largest satellite in the solar system) has a great ocean beneath its surface, rather like Europa apparently has. But otherwise I think this article covers our cosmic “locality” fairly well.

 

© Paul Butters 18\1\2001.  

 

Tuesday 8 December 2020

Our Universe

 

I must be a Seasonal Creature. This morning I got to thinking about the awesome size of the “Universe” and what might lie beyond. Did some research. But haven’t I written on this before? Checked. Yes I have! Here it is – read it if you wish. Am not bothered either way:

https://planetpaul1.blogspot.com/2017/12/is-universe-really-whole-thing.html

So, the “Observable Universe” is 93 Billion Light Years in diameter. Anything beyond that (that is part of this universe) is travelling faster than light so cannot be seen. But the Whole Universe is 14 Trillion Light Years Plus across per Ethan Siegel. And Cornell University talk of the Bayesian Model of The Universe, whereby it’s 23 Trillion Light Years in diameter.  (I understand that a Trillion is a thousand Billion). In short, The Universe: IT’S BIG.

They say The Universe is 13.8 Billion years old. That’s from “The Big Bang”. And our Solar System, including The Earth, is but 4.5 Billion years old (“New Kids On The Block”!).

Our home galaxy, The Milky Way, contains hundreds of billions of stars. But The Universe is made up (at least partly) of about 2 Trillion galaxies. I am getting fed up of using the words “billion” and “trillion”!

But let me say again: “all” we are talking about here is that “Great Sphere” of “Matter” (“Light” and “Dark”!) we call “The Universe”. A sphere, regular or otherwise, that is expanding out from that original Singularity we term “The Big Bang”. And as I asserted in 2017, that may well Not be the Whole Thing!

As with talking about “God”, we soon hit an issue about “Definition”. The standard definition of The Universe is: “All of space and time and their contents”. This is where I have a Problem. Some use this definition to describe “The Cosmos” rather than “The Universe”. And in my View they are quite right to do so. For The Universe isn’t necessarily the “Whole Thing”. Even The Cosmos might not be Everything either!

Incidentally some have postulated that The Universe is Infinite in size. Well, surely not if we are talking about The Great Sphere, because that began an infinite time ago so can only have expanded an infinite number of miles. Now The Cosmos or “Existence” might be another matter… And that’s before we consider “Parallel Universes\Multiverses” etc.

As for the Future of The Great Sphere, well I go for the theory that it will eventually just “fade away”. Apparently it will go through a long “Black Hole” Period and in about 110 Trillion Years the last star will wink out. Then it will “thin out” even more. Way back in 2012 I wrote a short story about it:

https://paulbuttersmystories.blogspot.com/2012/09/our-universe-ends.html

I don’t hold out any hope for the “Future Implosion” theory. Nice notion but… So yes, The Great Sphere is not infinite and not eternal in its present form. Nor is it Everything in my humble view. In a way it’s not even the “Whole Universe or Cosmos”.

What lies beyond the Great Sphere? As with so many things, we simply just don’t know. I am missing some Champions League football now – much more important! Haha.

Paul Butters

© PB 8\12\2020.

 

Thursday 3 December 2020

What Are We Here For?

 


The following is from yesterday’s entry to my “Confidential Journal”. I felt I should be bold (or stupid) enough to share it publically (if slightly modified for privacy reasons etc.):

“…Today I put on Facebook the following:

‘Controversial - Instead of imprisoning kids in schools we should give them laptops and show them educational videos!’

…I was half expecting someone to reply, “But you were a teacher!” Thinking on this, I now reflect that I did not believe in either of my two main jobs. I never liked School and I didn’t want to force kids onto “slave labour” government “schemes” as a “Careers Adviser”. Sure, I enjoyed helping kids learn and I loved supporting them in Careers Interviews. Mine were indeed “Helping Interviews”. (I now see myself as having been a “Career Coach\Developer”). But I didn’t agree with many of our “company objectives”. So why did I enter such “Bad Jobs” in the first place?

The honest answer is that I never really knew what I wanted to do. Like thousands more I just followed the “Academic Route”. At least, for me, that was an escape from working in a foundry alongside Dad, bless him. Both my parents fully supported me taking this road: if they couldn’t escape, at least their children could. Indeed many folk have been “Perpetual Students”. (I know at least two).

Maybe I should have bit the bullet and become a Journalist. Or maybe settle for being a Librarian. I still don’t know. Nor do I know what Life is all about. I keep writing poems on this and the inner search goes on. Recently I invented “Lifism”: whereby you cherish All Living Things and take it from there. Sorry but I can’t just blindly follow the instruction of some “God” on all this. I remain an “Agnostic”. But as the joke goes, “I really just don’t know”. I’m with the Ancient Philosopher Aristotle on this (if I understand him correctly). Maybe I am here to try to find out or create what it’s all about…”

The Quest goes on.

Paul Butters

© PB 2-3\12\2020.

Saturday 21 November 2020

The Russian Revolution According to 'Royal Fibs' Creator Lucy Worsley

(Picture Credit - DW).

Thursday 18 June 2020

How To Understand Us Dour, Reticent, Surly, Matter of Fact, Few-Word Yorkshire Folk

(Picture Credit - Yorks Man by Alamy)

Here are some translations that might help -

Yorkie: "It's\that's okay" = "That's utterly and stupendously wonderful, my good man. A complete earthquake of a shock - shattering the space-time continuum and rendering the universe a pile of rubble. Really appreciate your kind generosity!"

Yorkie: "I agree" = "Yes, I have studied your thesis for hours. Didn't like to reply straight away - kept it on the back burner so I could rumminate through your wise and comprehensive thoughts. And yes, your views are sheer genius and spot on once again."

Yorkie: "On Ilkla moer bah tat" = "strolling on the historic slopes of Ilkley Moor in God's Own County, though suffering from those icy northern winds because I forgot to wear my hat."

However, sometimes this same Yorkshire person may mean something quite different (and there's the conundrum that baffles the rest of the world), eg they might mean....

Yorkie: "It's\that's okay" = it's\that's okay"...

Or even...

Yorkie: "I agree" = "I agree" or "Wot's all this? I better just agree!"

LOL

Paul Butters

© PB 18\6\2020.